In Part 1, I decided to use the handwritten "London" vocal book as my piano/conductor score because it had everything I needed for the production including ensemble parts that were crammed into any available space on the pages. I still don't know with 100% certainty which version this book is, but from what I've seen online and from the order in the score, it appears to be the original 1986 West End version. (This is typically referred to as "The London Version".)
From my discussions with the director, it sounded as if she was going to stick to the 2008 Royal Albert Hall version for inspiration. This would include using the story as presented in the 1986 West End version ... which was the same production that I was using as my source for the music. So we were definitely on the same page there.
This gave me four sources that I would end up using to determine how the music would go:
- The 1986 West End piano/conductor score
- The original soundtrack album
- The 2008 Royal Albert Hall concert, with Idina Menzel and Josh Groban
- The Concord Theatricals rental scores
The next question was: How much was I willing to change what was in the score?
A quick explanation for people who aren't music directors: All shows are "changed" in some way in order to fit the needs of the production. In the case of ACTC, it's not a huge stage (the Lyceum holds 200 people), so music that's written for set changes, or to get people from point A to point B can always be trimmed down, Vamps are usually shorter, and I'm almost always cutting big chunks of music out of the scores in order to make it all work on a small stage.
There are also times when music is actually ADDED to the score, depending on the needs of the director and/or choreographer. I did a show for Vanguard once where the choreographer used a YouTube video in which a big dance number had been completely rearranged. By the time I found out, it was too late to change it, so I had no choice but to listen to it over and over until I had the arrangement figured out ... and then transmit that to my band. It ended up great in the end, but it was just a lot of work, and a lot of customization.
So making changes to the score is inevitable. But how much? Did I want to do the songs "pretty much how they're written"? Or did I want to lean into a lot of customization in order to get the music the way I liked it?
Here's the list of considerations that guided me in my decision:
- The 1986 score SHOULD be very similar to the 1984 album as they were being produced at the same time
- Making major changes is like eating Lay's potato chips -- "nobody can eat (or rearrange) just one". So committing to making a major change in one number is just going to make it that much easier to rearrange everything ...
- The show is HUGE. Do I really want to make that many changes?
- Endgame #2, which is the list of previous chess champions, is ridiculous. Who cares about these people? They have nothing to do with the story except for historical interest. Also, our chess champion is a FICTITIOUS person; so why would we care about presenting a list of REAL champions in music form?
- Endgame #1 and the Prologue are essentially the same music, but it does nothing to advance the story. Three minutes of a standalone orchestral/choral piece in which no words are sung. What is this doing in the musical?
- The 2008 version had some extensive changes made to several songs, as well as choreography which would result in rearrangement ... and I'm using the 2008 version as one of my sources.
- My choreographer will almost certainly be using music that I don't have .. and so I'll be rearranging ANYWAY.
- I'm retired now. I've got the time.